Week 3 Discussion Foundations -Benjamin Johnson

THIS IS ONLY AN INTERPRETATION, FIVE SENTENCES AND A QUESTION IS ALL I NEED. TELL ME YOUR THOUGHTS, HAVE REFERENCES

• Suggest additional criteria for determining whether an article is peer-reviewed.
• Offer an additional situation in which using a resource that is not peer-reviewed would be acceptable.In
  the library it is difficult to find peer review article, especially
  when you search a sort title such as ?Civil Laws?. Although there is an
  option on the Walden University Library website to select rather you
  want to search only peer review articles, it seems to give you articles
  that don?t coincide with the topic you?re looking for. Matt states that
  scholarly articles can come in all shapes and sizes depending on the
  subject being covered and the type of research being performed. For
  example, a scholarly article by an expert in the Humanities will write
  what is called a literature review, wherein they discuss a work of art
  (book, painting, etc ?) and their research will be based off of what
  previous experts have written about that piece. However, a scholarly
  article by an expert in a Science field may write about an experiment
  they have performed, and discuss their results and how it relates to
  previous research (Matt, 2011). The article I choose which is considered
  an academic journal title is ?Diversity, disparate impact, and
  discrimination pursuant to Title VII of US civil rights laws?. This
  particular article proved to be a peer reviewed article based on the
  purpose, findings and research of the journal. The disadvantages of peer
  review writings is that peer reviewers have not got an easy job
  spotting conflicts of interest, such as the source of a researcher?s
  funding, only that the research was followed to acceptable protocols
  (Shuttleworth, 2018). According to Shuttleworth there are no grading
  systems about the quality of the peer review. Different journals have
  different standards, and there is no way to know the expertise and
  quality of the reviewers or editor. In the past, less reputable journals
  generally had a smaller readership, but the internet has made them just
  as likely to be accessed and used. Shuttleworth also states that the
  advantages of peer reviews is that peer reviewing allows a diversity of
  opinions to be brought to the table, theoretically removing any personal
  biases and pre-set ideas from the equation. The peer review process
  stops a lot of substandard and poor science from reaching publication.
  In addition, the reviewers are generally experts in their field, well
  acquainted with the latest developments. They can, therefore, reject
  duplicate research and plagiarized papers (Shuttleworth, 2018).
  Cavico,
  F. J., & Mujtaba, B. (2017). Diversity, disparate impact, and
  discrimination pursuant to Title VII of US civil rights laws. Equality,
  Diversity & Inclusion, 36(7), 670. doi:10.1108/EDI-04-2017-0091
  Matt. (2011). PIONEERS. Retrieved from https://pioneersread.wordpress.com/2011/08/31/5-ways-to-tell-if-the-article-is-scholarly-aka-peer-reviewed-aka-academic/
  Shuttleworth,
  Martyn. (2018). EXPOLRABLES: Disadvantages of Peer Reviews. Retrieved
  from https://explorable.com/disadvantages-of-peer-revie…